|
In releasing AIA Document A201-2007, General Conditions
of the Contract for Construction, the American Institute of
Architects unveiled some significant changes to their
widely-used Owner-Contractor form. Though not exhaustive
of all changes, this article summarizes six changes to
the form agreement that will most significantly impact owners
and contractors.
1. Binding arbitration is no longer a standard requirement
under A201-2007. Rather, parties to the contract may
subsequently agree to arbitrate their disputes. As such, owners
and contractors alike should no longer assume that an
individual experienced in the construction industry will
serve as fact-finder and decision-maker regarding contractual
disputes.
2. A201-2007 permits an owner to carry out the contractor’s
work ten days after provision of notice to the contractor.
Under A201-1997, the owner had to provide a first
notice, wait seven days for the contractor to resume work,
provide a second notice, and wait another three days before
it could carry out the contractor’s work. In short, the new
language requires contractors to be more proactive in responding
to the owner’s demands, as failure to respond to an
owner’s request to correct a perceived deficiency entitles the
owner to correct such deficiency at the contractor’s expense
after ten days.
3. A201-2007 provides the owner an opportunity to object
to the appointment of a supervisor before the contractor
begins the Project and precludes the contractor
from changing the supervisor without the owner’s consent.
The Architect’s approval “shall not be unreasonably
delayed or withheld.” As such submittal and approval is a
condition precedent to a contractor claiming an increase in
Contract Sum or Contract Time, the clause presents a potential
further impediment to a streamlined change order process.
4. A201-2007 provides the owner an opportunity to object
to the appointment of a supervisor before the contractor
begins the Project and precludes the contractor from changing
the supervisor without the owner’s consent. By contrast,
under A201-1997, the contractor agreed only to employ a
competent superintendent to supervise the Project.
|
5. Under A201-2007, a contractor’s review of contract
documents is not completed as a licensed design professional.
The new language attempts to bar an owner from
claiming that the contractor should have taken notice of a
defect in design or of additional work necessary to carry out
the intent of the contract documents provided by the owner.
Note, however, the contractor could still be liable for failing
to detect something that an experienced contractor (not a designer)
should have detected.
6. A201-2007 no longer requires the owner to respond to
requests for information within fifteen (15) days, providing,
instead, “reasonable promptness” as the presumptive
standard. Although parties may agree to a more definite
time period for an owner’s response to a request for information,
accepting a “reasonableness” standard may result
in disputes.
As noted above, this brief summary of changes is hardly exhaustive
of the differences between A201-1997 and A201-
2007. This summary does identify, however, several issues
that owners and contractors should be wary of when using the
new AIA documents.
|